3D Mammograms: Who Needs 3D & Why Get One Every Year
BRCA Carriers at Extra Risk from Radiation
Increased risk was also associated with early mammography.
By Crystal Phend, MedPage Today
Medically Reviewed byDori F Zaleznik, MD
Don't Miss This
Sign Up for OurCancer Care and PreventionNewsletter
Thanks for signing up!You might also like these other newsletters:
THURSDAY, Sept. 6, 2012 (MedPage Today) —Young women at high familial risk for breast cancer may see an even greater risk from diagnostic scans that expose them to chest radiation, including mammograms, researchers found.
Any diagnostic use of radiation before age 30 increased breast cancer risk by 90 percent for carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, according to a retrospective analysis of three nationwide cohorts in Europe by Flora E. van Leeuwen, MSc, PhD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, and colleagues.
A history of mammography before age 30 also tended to raise the risk by 43 percent, a finding that persisted with adjustment for family history as an indication, although without statistical significance, the group reported online inBMJ.
If all carriers had one mammogram before age 30, the number developing breast cancer by age 40 would rise from nine to 14 out of every 100.
"The results support the use of non-ionizing radiation imaging techniques (such as MRI) for surveillance in young with BRCA1/2 mutations," they wrote.
These breast cancer risk-associated mutations impair the body's ability to fix double-strand breaks in DNA caused by ionizing radiation.
While carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations were thus thought to have heightened radiosensitivity, prior studies suggested much higher thresholds for risk.
Van Leeuwen's group analyzed radiation exposure in 1,993 adult women, whose pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was discovered through testing at a genetic clinic. They were recruited into the GENE-RAD-RISK project through national cohort studies in France, the U.K., and the Netherlands from 2006 to 2009.
In the entire cohort, 65 percent were BRCA1 carriers while 35 percent were BRCA2 carriers.
Women self-reported lifetime exposure to fluoroscopy, conventional x-rays or CT scans of the chest or shoulders, mammography, and other diagnostic procedures like bone scans involving the chest or shoulders.
Breast cancer risk rose with the cumulative dose of radiation, for a significant 3.84-fold elevated risk in women with a dose over 0.0174 Gy.
Exposure to more than the relatively low dose of 0.0066 Gy before age 20 yielded a similar 3.16-fold increase in breast cancer risk among the mutation carriers, though the impact wasn't significant for exposure during their 30s.
Almost half of the women had a radiograph at some point, with a median of 2.5 before age 40.
A higher number of radiographs before age 20 also showed a dose-response curve to breast cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers.
More than four chest or shoulder x-rays boosted the hazard ratio to 1.83 if before age 30 and to 2.04 from ages 30 to 39.
Mammograms were also common (33 percent), with a median of 2.4 scans before age 40.
Greater exposure to mammography in young women likewise showed a significant trend without statistically significant point estimates for risk with exposure before age 30.
"We were concerned that this latter association might be attributed to confounding by indication — that is, self selection for early mammography in carriers with a strong family history of breast cancer," the researchers acknowledged.
However, the cumulative breast dose remained linked to breast cancer risk even after excluding women who had mammography from a sensitivity analysis.
CT exposure before age 30 also seemed to be associated with risk of breast cancer (HR 2.36) but with wide confidence intervals due to the few number of cases.
The authors also noted that any exposure before age 30 in BRCA1 carriers was associated with an increased risk. They did not observe this same association for BRCA2 carriers, but the sample size may have been too small for a subanalysis.
The researchers cautioned about their use of retrospectively self-reported radiation exposure, which might have introduced recall bias.
Other limitations were that the follow-up may not have been long enough to see a risk from radiation exposure at ages 30 to 40, and that radiation dose variations between hospitals and machines may have impacted the cumulative dose estimates. Finally, the dose estimates for mammography were based on a two-view mammogram and there may have been dose differences based on breast size and equipment parameters.
Video: Addressing Facts and Fears in the Face of Breast Cancer
How to Identify Gallbladder Disease
5 Healthy Drinks That Regulate Your Mood
10 Black-based Nail Art Looks to Get You Ready for Fall
Style Spy: Winter Outerwear
How to Avoid Facebook Marketplace Scams
5 Strawberry Smoothies Youll Want to Sip, Stat
How to Convince Your Parents to Give You a Later Curfew
15 Photos That Prove the VMAs Were Wild in the 00s
Coffee and Hazelnut Parfait with Chilled Mocha Custard Recipe
How to Increase Blood Flow to the Brain
How to Revive Post-Flight Hair in 5 Minutes Flat
5 Foolproof Ways Not to Screw Up Thanksgiving ThisYear